It has been a year since we published the results of our global survey on what news organisations are doing with and thinking about AI technologies. The big themes that stuck out for me from that research were:
Augmentation: Most use cases were designed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the work of human journalists, not to replace them. AI-powered technologies were used to connect content better to the public, rather than to replicate the editorial process.
Knowledge gap: There was a shortage of people skilled in AI technologies and, just as important, a lack of knowledge across news organisations about the potential and pitfalls of those technologies. …
We are seeing a reshaping of what it means to have a career in journalism. The rise of the ‘passion economy’, increasing freelancing, more niche publications and more ‘fluid’ or precarious employment are all creating new pathways to working in news media. But is this simply a desperate response to the journalism business crisis and to pandemic upheaval? Or is it an explosion of innovation in reaction to the limits of traditional news organisations? Is it a marginal set of trends or something more fundamental for journalism as an industry and as an ethical, political, social practice?
TL/DR: Don’t believe (all) the hype and don’t ignore the resilience of ‘legacy media’ but yes, there’s a lot going on and it will change journalism longer-term. Perhaps the real lesson is not to fall into the trap of that largely pointless debate from 10–20 years ago about ‘are bloggers journalists?’. This is not a binary process. In practice, both the emergent and established news models and practices have a lot to learn from each other as hybrid news paradigms evolve. …
AI and journalism is a very technical issue but we are talking about this technology at a critical historical moment for journalism. I don’t want to over-indulge in hyperbole but in the midst of this pandemic we can see some serious forces coming together that present a remarkable set of challenges to journalism. How can AI help?
[This article is based on a keynote speech by Charlie Beckett, director of the Polis/LSE Journalism AI project, to a conference at Charles University, Prague, ‘Challenges of Journalism — Automated journalism and AI journalism’]
Here in Prague you know all about the economic, political challenges — one could say threats — that much of global journalism now faces. Add to that the media-specific challenges of a changing information environment. These would be enough for any industry, but what is also clear is that the nature of journalism — its value and its values — are being questioned and reformed. It is vital to see the adoption of AI within that larger framework, even as we dive into the details. …
The pandemic is changing journalism and it’s changing how we talk about it. I should have been sitting with dozens of other European media people around a long table in the glorious baroque setting of the orangery in Potsdam Palace outside Berlin, discussing “Shaping the Post-Covid Media Order” as part of the M100 Sanssouci Colloquium. Instead it was a group Zoom call, of course. Here are my notes for my intervention in the session on “Saving the news? Next Level Journalism”.
Who is going to save journalism? How is it going to happen?
After two decades as a journalist, I created a journalism think-tank and became a professor at the LSE. I wrote a book over a decade ago about ‘saving journalism so it can save the world’. The message was that the news media had to embrace new technologies and new ways of working to become more networked. …
Polis director Charlie Beckett argues that these are all related trends in this article based on the evidence he gave recently to a UK parliamentary inquiry into the future of journalism.
Last year, Polis conducted a global survey of what newsrooms around the world were doing with AI and machine learning technologies and we are now working with a network of 1000+ digital news media people on creating training and innovation projects. So we are in a great position to see how Covid-19 is impacting on technology-driven innovation. …
The details of the story about Dominic Cummings, (the chief aide to UK Prime Minister) travelling in breach of the government’s coronavirus rules matter because it might have a material impact on people’s behaviour and the attempts to control the disease. As my colleague (and tens of thousands of others) points out:
It also counts politically because it questions the principles and practice of the man leading that effort, the Prime Minister and his most senior aide. …
Another opinion poll question shows low levels of ‘trust’ in British journalists. But this is not the problem you might think it is. In some ways it’s worse.
Sky News’ YouGov poll was part of a much broader survey of trust in UK public figures and on policy issues related to the coronoavirus crisis and the ‘lockdown’ measures. It ranges widely:
“The country has thrown itself into housework, cooking and gardening but fewer than one in three are doing more exercise than usual and fewer than one in 15 say draconian restrictions on lifestyle means having more sex.”
It’s a perfectly reputable poll in its own terms but the questions on journalism are just one small part of a wider survey and the pollsters didn’t ask people why they don’t ‘trust’ news media and or what people mean by ‘trust’ or lack of it. At times of national division and heated debate on top of four years of divisive Brexit debate with two very opposed main political parties, it’s not surprising that people are sceptical about everything. After ten years of austerity followed by an unprecedented pandemic there’s a lot to be angry and upset about. …
Journalists are under enormous pressure right now. There is a huge public appetite for information and debate and the means to feed it are tougher than ever. The coronavirus story is unprecedented. It is still early days but what can we learn about the challenge to journalism it presents?
Overall, I think journalists are doing heroic work from international to local levels. Clearly, there have been specific mistakes and overall questions about the quality of coverage. But first let’s try to understand the context because it is novel and brutal.
Back in 2011 in the wake of the financial crisis and after a summer of peculiar English riots, I became obsessed with the ideas of uncertainty and complexity as it relates to media and politics. I’d just written a book about the WikiLeaks revelations of 2010 which seemed to suggest that our world and the way we report it had to…
AI Invest: new strategies for journalism
How can the news media find investment to support the development of new AI technologies? Our recent global survey of news organisations showed that there are special challenges as well as opportunities for journalism. This presentation by Polis director Charlie Beckett, given at an event at UK VC company Hambro Perks, outlined a strategic approach that can tap into the new AI investment landscape.
My example is from my LSE research on news media and especially my latest project on AI but it resonates wider. …
The BBC has announced plans to ‘modernise’ its news service in the face of the need to find £80 million of savings. It says it will restructure the news division and reform its ‘news agenda’ along with cutting 450 jobs. There is rightly a lot of debate about the BBC’s wider role and some detailed critiques of its coverage, especially of political news. In this article, Charlie Beckett, director of Polis at LSE has a first look at the proposed changes in editorial strategy and asks whether it is just a way of trimming costs or whether it really can help make BBC journalism fit for a world of networked digital news. …
About